本文已被:浏览 162次 下载 114次
投稿时间:2024-04-11 修订日期:2024-04-29
投稿时间:2024-04-11 修订日期:2024-04-29
中文摘要: 超声喷丸是一种用于改善高附加价值复杂结构零部件疲劳性能的重要表面强化技术。弹丸在工件表面的冲击位置分布及冲击速度等是影响超声喷丸强化效果的重要因素,而常规的实验测量方法存在较大的技术难度,且试错成本高,为了减少成本,因而采用数值仿真方法研究超声喷丸过程弹丸的冲击动力学已成为了研究热点之一。本文分别采用多体动力学软件ADAMS和离散元软件EDEM,建立了超声喷丸三维仿真模型,计算获得了弹丸冲击位置、冲击速度和冲击角度等冲击动力学数据,开展两种方法数值仿真结果的准确性和计算效率两方面对比,并分析了两种方法的数值仿真效果的研究。研究结果表明,两种方法均可用于超声喷丸过程弹丸的冲击动力学仿真研究,当弹丸数量较少(如20个)时,两者的计算结果一致性较好,但ADAMS的仿真效率约为EDEM的2倍;而当弹丸数量较多(如50个)时,EDEM的计算结果更为准确,且计算效率比ADAMS提高了5.7倍。
Abstract:Ultrasonic shot peening is an important surface strengthening technology for improving the fatigue performance of complex structural parts with high added value. The impact position distribution and impact velocity of the projectile on the workpiece surface are important factors affecting the strengthening effect of ultrasonic shot peening. However, the conventional experimental measurement method has great technical difficulty and high trial and error cost. In order to reduce the cost, the use of numerical simulation method to study the impact [ 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52305328);北京市教委科技一般项目(KM202210009009);北方工业大学毓杰团队人才培养 计划项目(XN212/009)
]dynamics of
the projectile in the process of ultrasonic shot peening has become one of the research hotspots. In this paper, the multi-body dynamics software ADAMS and the discrete element software EDEM [ 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52305328);北京市教委科技一般项目(KM202210009009);北方工业大学毓杰团队人才培养 计划项目(XN212/009)]are respectively used to establish the three-dimensional simulation model of ultrasonic shot peening, and the impact dynamics data such as the impact position, impact velocity and impact angle are calculated and obtained. The accuracy and calculation efficiency of the two methods are compared, and the numerical simulation effect of the two methods is analyzed. The results show that both methods can be used for the simulation study of the impact dynamics of the projectile in the process of ultrasonic shot peening. When the number of projectiles is small (such as 20), the calculation results of the two methods are in good agreement, but the simulation efficiency of ADAMS is about 2 times that of EDEM. When the number of projectiles is large (such as 50), the calculation results of EDEM are more accurate, and the calculation efficiency is 5.7 times higher than that of ADAMS.
keywords: Ultrasonic shot peening Impact dynamics of projectiles ADAMS EDEM Computational efficiency
文章编号:YSJSGC20240232 中图分类号: 文献标志码:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52305328);北京市教委科技一般项目(KM202210009009);北方工业大学毓杰团队人才培养 计划项目(XN212/009)
引用文本:
刘聪,欧阳佩旋,张淑婷,宋杰人,文艺,刘璐.基于超声喷丸弹丸冲击动力学仿真方法的对比研究[J].有色金属工程,2025,(1):.
Liu Cong,OUYANG Peixuan,ZHANG Shuting,Song Jieren,Wen Yi,Liu Lu.Comparative Study on Simulation Methods of Impact Dynamics of Projectiles for Ultrasonic Shot Peening[J].NONFERROUS METALS ENGINEERING,2025,(1):.
刘聪,欧阳佩旋,张淑婷,宋杰人,文艺,刘璐.基于超声喷丸弹丸冲击动力学仿真方法的对比研究[J].有色金属工程,2025,(1):.
Liu Cong,OUYANG Peixuan,ZHANG Shuting,Song Jieren,Wen Yi,Liu Lu.Comparative Study on Simulation Methods of Impact Dynamics of Projectiles for Ultrasonic Shot Peening[J].NONFERROUS METALS ENGINEERING,2025,(1):.